The UK Home Office announced on Saturday that it plans to install electronic surveillance equipment for asylum seekers arriving in the country in “unnecessary and dangerous” ways.
The ministry stressed that the scheme would be tested for 12 months and aimed at “improving and maintaining contacts” with asylum seekers.
According to the public channel BBC, asylum seekers who should have been sent to Rwanda this week will be the first to be pursued and prevented from being deported by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR).
A ministry spokesman promised that at least one of the seven asylum seekers would be released by court order and that “appropriate” electronic devices would be used.
In an interview with The Telegraph, Home Minister Priti Patel criticized the European Court of ECtHR’s “defamatory” decision within the jurisdiction of the European Council.
“We have to look at the motives. Why did they make this decision? Was it politically motivated? In my opinion, of course,” the minister said, accusing the court of “opacity”.
We do not know who the judges were or who was on the panel [de decisão]. We do not really have a sentence, we have a press release and a letter stating that these persons cannot be transferred, “he said.
This week, a spokesman for British Prime Minister Boris Johnson opened up the possibility of the UK abandoning the European Convention on Human Rights, underlining the ECtHR ‘s jurisdiction and “all options”. Desk “.
Attorney General Suella Brewerman said the administrator was “definitely ready to consider all options” regarding his “future relationship” with the Strasbourg court.
The British government intends to send asylum seekers to Rwanda who are believed to have entered the UK illegally.
The African country that evaluates your requests will, if accepted, grant them asylum in its territory, or, if not, process your deportation to your home country.
“Reader. Infuriatingly humble travel enthusiast. Extreme food scholar. Writer. Communicator.”
