This is why Megan Markle did not return to the UK

Since the announcement of the resignation of senior members of the British Royalty in early 2020 by Megan Markley and Prince Harry, much has been said about the possibility of both returning to live in the UK. Since then, they have lived in Santa Barbara, California, USA, but have rented a country house in the UK. Renewed this year along with rent.

In an interview with the British newspaper The Sun, writer and statesman Tom Bower said: “At present, Meghan’s fate is not clear, but she certainly has the support to give him a chance to play American politics. At the same time, Britain is a lost cause for Sussex. I hope Megan does not worry about coming to London and she has no intention of returning. ”

See also: Megan Markle recommends changing social media to control hate speech

Tom Bower has been called the “most feared biographer” in England. He works on a book about the Duchess of Sussex, and says his rejection of the country was due to his declining popularity in the United States and rising recognition ratings.

“After a Hollywood-style wedding in Winter, he complained about the British media and the royal family’s treatment the following year. His hypocrisy began to tarnish his reputation.

Prince Harry in court battle to return safely to England

In February, Prince Harry began a legal battle in the UK High Court against the British Home Office. The Duke of Sussex is asking the ministry to cover the costs and provide police protection for himself, Megan Markle and their children when they move to the UK.

Harry and Meghan lost the police protection provided by the British government in early 2020 when they resigned as senior members of the British royal family. Harry’s lawyer said he and Megan wanted to take their children to the UK from time to time, but he said it was a very dangerous trip.

Harry argues that his U.S. private security team has no foreign jurisdiction or access to UK intelligence, making family travel to his country very risky.

Harry’s attorney said the Duke wanted to personally fund the protection of himself and his family, but the fact that his team could not have jurisdiction over the most effective action outside the United States was not enough for his defense committee.