Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Mediarun Search
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Mediarun Search
    Home»science»Judge imposes fines on municipality for delay in scheduling consultation and examination at SUS
    science

    Judge imposes fines on municipality for delay in scheduling consultation and examination at SUS

    Camelia KirkBy Camelia KirkApril 22, 2024No Comments2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Judge imposes fines on municipality for delay in scheduling consultation and examination at SUS
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    It is the state's duty imposed by the Constitution to guarantee the right to health for all citizens. With this understanding, Judge Adriana da Silva Frías Pereira, of the First Civil Court of Atibaia (SP), ordered the municipality to provide consultation and examination to the citizen and to set a fine for the delay in complying with the decision.

    The patient is suffering from arthrodesis, an orthopedic term meaning joint fusion

    According to records, the woman waited in line at the public health system for approximately two years. As her clinical condition deteriorated, she went to court under a mandatory procedure, requesting urgent protection, forcing the municipality to schedule a consultation and examination within 48 hours.

    Initially, the injunction was denied, but after the author's appeal, the interlocutory appeal was granted, resulting in appellate relief. In response, the Municipal Treasury of Atibaia reported that the consultation and examination it requested had been carried out.

    com.sadasdsadsa

    The local city council justified the delay by the absence of specialized specialists in municipal hospitals, which prompted the patient to undergo the operation in another city.

    After complying with the injunction, the judge issued a final decision, reiterating the obligation to set the appointment, even if it had already been made.

    In the ruling, it recognized that health is a right guaranteed by the Constitution and that delays in care violate this basic right.

    In addition, a fine was imposed for delay in compliance with urgent protection, reducing the amount initially set to R$3,000. The author was defended by a lawyer Clipper Stevens Garage.

    See also  ANVISA ban on chocolate brands

    Click here to read the decision
    Process 1007697-42.2022.8.26.0048

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Camelia Kirk

    "Friendly zombie guru. Avid pop culture scholar. Freelance travel geek. Wannabe troublemaker. Coffee specialist."

    Related Posts

    Can members transplant change a person's personality?

    August 18, 2025

    The new European Union system for UK travelers: It is not necessary

    August 18, 2025

    Teenagers who have the worst mental health spend more time on social networks

    August 16, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Navigate
    • Home
    • Top News
    • World
    • Economy
    • science
    • Technology
    • sport
    • entertainment
    • Contact Form
    Pages
    • About Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • DMCA
    • Editorial Policy
    • Contact Form
    MAIN MENU
    • Home
    • Top News
    • World
    • Economy
    • science
    • Technology
    • sport
    • entertainment
    • Contact Form
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    © 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.