Sao Paulo
The influencer Bruna Bayrakardi and the player Neymar He left the house where they lived CotiaIn the capital area in Sao Paulo, after they found that they were seen by security cameras installed inside the property.
The case was brought to the court in April this year, but it was closed through an outside of the judiciary between the two parties. Another procedural movement was registered on August 7, with a request to present the operation. According to the procedures submitted by Brona, the problems began shortly after the signing of the lease contract agreement, in March 2024, with the monthly amount of 41 thousand dollars.
According to the document, from the beginning, the couple was the goal of invasive methods by the owners. Brona states that the owner and his wife tried to approach the influence and the athlete, and asked for the photos, which led to the Brona team to deal with issues without relationship with the contract and share personal information.
In addition, real estate owners will keep access to the pictures of the internal security cameras, even after the claim that they have canceled the installation of applications and exchanged passwords for the devices. Conversation publications attached to the operation show that home owners used recordings to claim that Brona would have penetrated the bases by leaving her dog trading in certain areas, although the contract was not prohibited from the presence of animals.
For the influencer's lawyer, the behavior has violated the general and intimate data protection law and the terms of the contract that requires the estimated authority by the owner. The use of Audios was also cited by internal cameras without approval.
Defense claimed a violation of the General Data Protection Law (LGPD), the intimate relationship of the family, and the conditions for contracts that require my lesson. One of the items explicitly highlighted that the identity of the passengers should be preserved, at risk of termination of the contract.
The other annoyance point that the influencer referred to in this process was the revelation in which homeowners were investigated in crimes such as money laundering and concealment of assets. The minutes began to visit the property frequently, as they brought the summonses and collection notes – which, according to Bruuna's lawyers, were “peacefully possessed”.
For these reasons, the effect chose to leave the property. His legal team notified those responsible for the lease and requested that the contract be terminated without penalties, attributing the violation of the agreement to the lessor's behavior. The procedure also included a demand for compensation for moral damage.
