The Minister of Finance stated that the country witnessed a phase of disorganization of public accounts from Dilma to Bolsonaro
Minister of Finance, Fernando Haddadin an interview broadcast on Saturday (April 6, 2024) by Mio TV Brazil needs to turn the page “lack of financial responsibility” Dr.'s government experience Dilma Rousseff (PT) to manage Jair Bolsonaro (pl).
“The only way for Brazil to succeed is to turn the page on the past 10 years. From 2015, after Dilma's re-election, the authorities completely fell, until 2022, which was a very turbulent election, with a series of measures taken that led to an imbalance in public finances.Haddad told senators Jorge Cajuro (PSB-GO) and Laila Barros (PDT-DF), which conducted the program “Liberated Budak”.
“In my opinion, we have had ten years of fiscal irresponsibility, with very low growth. The bait has not produced the intended effects. We are cluttering the public accounts.”“, stated the Minister.
Despite including Dilma's government in his speech, the PT member did not directly criticize it. The Labor Party member ruled the country after the president's first two terms Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva (PT).
Haddad said again that only one “Covenant” The three powers will be able to bring order “chaos” recent years in the country.
“And I understand that this cannot be the opinion. I get it. And it has political limitations. There are political differences.”“, said the minister.
The head of the Brazilian economy said that the economic agenda in Congress for 2023 was interesting, but not enough to adjust public accounts.
He added: “We had an interesting agenda in 2023, but it is not enough. We did not do everything we needed to do. We must continue on this path.”he announced.
The minister said the country needs to overcome the differences the country has faced in the past decade and build a new direction.
“I think the ten years from 2013 to 2022 will be the subject of a major study. There has been a lot of confusion. The page on the confusion must be turned. We understand that there was a mistake.”“, he argued.
