Some of the dismissals recorded around the world are noteworthy due to several characteristics. One of them is a Frenchman who is only identified as the Master. T. He won a lawsuit against the company he worked for until 2015, the year he was fired for a somewhat unusual reason.
See also: A woman was fired from the company after her TikTok salary was revealed
According to the worker’s information, the reason for the dismissal was that he was not “fun”. This occurred after the man decided not to participate in the company’s happy hour (fraternization) and other socializing activities with his colleagues. profession🇧🇷
dismissal for lack of socialization; Understanding the condition that scared many people
According to the French website Les Nouvelles, the Resignation given without just cause. Faced with this strange reason, the former employee turned to the French courts and filed a lawsuit against Cubik Partners. The company is a management consulting firm and lost the lawsuit years later, more specifically in 2022.
According to the victim’s account, the company demonstrated that its “fun” culture involved “degrading and intrusive practices”. In the examples cited, these practices included simulating sexual acts, sharing a bed with another employee during work hours, and using rude nicknames.
The company itself claimed that it used a more “fun” approach to implementing integration activities between the team. The aim will be to encourage employees to congregate in bars after working hours.
The lawsuit won for “freedom of expression.”
The Court recognized that the employee must respect his right to “freedom of expression” in not wanting to participate in the proposed activities. Therefore, the Reason for dismissal What should have been justified by the claim made.
In the case file, the company also criticized the former employee’s harsh and disheartening tone. He was a Senior Consultant in 2011 and was promoted to Director in 2014 Fired In 2015 due to “professional incompetence”.
A fine of 3 thousand euros, equivalent to 16.5 thousand Brazilian riyals, was imposed.
